Election of Officers
An election was held for the post of Chair of the National Training Committee,
to replace Dr Kennedy. Dr Forsyth was elected (22 votes; Dr Rittey 18; Dr
Cross 16).
Leicester
The President thanked everyone for their involvement and reported that the
review has now been completed and has hopefully achieved its purpose, despite
some criticisms
of how it was carried out. It is hoped that Dr Holton will return to work in
medicine, although details are still not clear.
Dr Stephenson asked about the legal liability of those taking part and was
reassured that the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust has provided
full indemnity.
Clinical Networks
Following the Leicester Review and the National Sentinel Clinical Audit of
Epilepsy-Related Death, the President met with the Clinical Medical Officer,
Professor
Donaldson, to discuss the management of childhood epilepsy. He described the
Clinical Network Document and the involvement of the Deanery Advisors and
epilepsy
interest groups. The aim of networks is to avoid professional isolation and
support Paediatricians with a specific responsibility for epilepsy. The
Clinical Network Document
is intended to be a living document, leading to audit and focussed
research, and therefore will have governance issues. In future it is hoped to
apply the
same principles to developing networks and guidelines for other conditions.
Organisation of Council
The President suggested that as the Training Committee has a very similar
agenda to Council itself, it seems appropriate to join the two together.
He proposed that the full Council could consist of elected Officers, Co-opted
Members and Deanery Advisors. In addition he asked whether Officers should be
elected at the AGM, as at present, or by postal vote. These proposals will be
put forward in the Spring Newsletter for further debate.
Role of Deanery Advisors / Service planning: new posts
The role of Deanery advisers is increasing. Service expansion is a particular
issue: it is important that every centre has a business plan for an extra
Consultant
post prepared and available, since this can take six to ten years to achieve.
The President will circulate guidance notes on how to do this, including how to
identify
short falls in current services and resources, so that data can be provided to
local Specialist Health Authorities and Specialist Commissioning Services.
Secretariat
The appointment of Mrs Philippa Rodie has been a major success. She has
provided a very efficient service and has centralised a number of functions.
Her role will increase with the development of clinical networks and the
maintenance of a database on CSAC Visits. It is proposed that she shall set up
transferable systems.
Distance Learning Course
The launch has been delayed. The first residential conference will be before
the Sheffield Meeting in January 2004. There will be a training meeting for
mentors in the autumn.
The material provided by the authors of each unit looks both exciting and
interesting.
Dr Rosenbloom asked about the co-ordination of regional trainers activities with those of other paediatric specialities. Dr Newton explained that we currently attend the Paediatric Speciality Board to allow a combined approach. Dr Rosenbloom asked how a Deanery should pay for multiple visits by different speciality teams, each inspecting training provision in their own field. Dr Newton explained that, according to a Departmental circular, Trusts are expected to meet the expenses.
Dr Green highlighted both good practice points and difficulties found during the Visits. Similar difficulties, especially in IT, secretarial support, child psychiatry training and structured teaching, recurred in several centres. He raised the possibility of SpRs spending time in other centres for more specialised experience, for example in neonatal neurology.
Dr Sharples asked about the inspection of both service and training. Dr Green explained that in large organisations such as neonatal group each aspect could be assessed separately but the BPNA Visits tried to combine inspection of both. The meeting thanked Dr Green for his work in setting up and carrying out this work.
He also reviewed outreach services: a true outreach clinic is defined as a combined clinic with a local Consultant Paediatrician and a visiting Consultant Paediatric Neurologist both present. There is a marked shortfall in such clinics.
He discussed amendments to the rules governing election to membership of the Association and the maintenance of the membership list by the Secretariat. He suggested everyone should have a unique membership number and that members names should be listed on the Website, without contact details. If a member changes address they could inform the Secretariat electronically instead of using the current time consuming process. He also proposed that applicants already in recognised training posts would not have to provide a CV. He will detail these proposals in the Newsletter. Dr Jardine asked about losses of trainees in paediatric neurology. The data is not available, although it was agreed it would be useful, especially with the National Grid Professor Neville pointed out that an academic appointment is sometimes considered an official form of "wastage" which can distort trainee numbers. Dr Ferrie said that he had tried to allow for this but it does need more accurate quantification.
Trainee registration is now complete. 23 trainees are exempt but 9 are not, who are all in National Grid posts. There will be 7 posts this year. He requested that all training centres should provide information about themselves and their training programme on a single side of A4.
Replying to a question from Dr Lin, Dr Kennedy said there had been 12 applicants for the 8 posts, with 1 already in post and 1 with an academic link. Dr Lin also asked if candidates could be ranked as being unsuitable. Although theoretically possible, this did not happen. Dr Cavanagh asked about an unfilled trainee post. It was suggested that he and colleagues in a similar position should contact the National Training Adviser rather than their lead Deanery. Dr Sharples raised the issue of academic trainees, who have difficulties since it is not possible to accept a post and then to take time for research before starting the post. At present, if such a post is accepted, this would require local negotiations with the paediatric Regional Adviser and the Deanery Adviser in paediatric neurology. It was agreed that these are important issues, some of which are unresolved. Dr Newton asked about counselling for candidates who were not appointed. Last year the Chairman contacted the unsuccessful candidates.
Assessment of trainees / RITA
Dr Kennedy described the Deanery Adviser pack that he has circulated, based on
the RCPCH model.
In the penultimate year assessment it has proved impossible to have a representative from outside the Deanery as planned, so it has been agreed to centralise the assessment, as nephrology and oncology have done. The trainees' portfolio and the report from their educational supervisor will be important in this assessment.
CCST Developments in Europe
Dr Kennedy reported that there will be a cycle of six instructional courses,
lasting two days, with an assessment at the end, starting at the meeting in
Sicily in October 2003. He also reported that the proposed paediatric
neurology syllabus has been accepted and that paediatric neurology is now an
official sub-speciality of paediatrics in Europe.
Standing Committee on Disability / BACCH liaison
Dr Smythe reviewed the current membership of the Standing Committee on
Disability at the College and its areas of work (education and training,
rehabilitation and mental health needs of adolescents). The CDDG, which is part
of BACCH, is a member of the Neurodisability group. There is also close
liaison with the working party on the management of autism for the national
service framework, and with the national service framework on disability.
BPNA 21-23 January 2004 Sheffield [dates later changed to 23-35 January 2004
BPNA 2005 GOSH, London